The Left is trying to sell America into a anti-science crusade, and it’s succeeding.
They’re trying to convince people that science is a conspiracy theory that they can dismiss with the same level of intellectual clarity with which they dismiss religion.
They have succeeded.
We don’t need to hear about a conspiracy when they’re using the same language that Christians used to dismiss religion years ago.
The Left has used the same rhetoric to dismiss the biblical account of the Flood, as they have used it to dismiss all of science and science-based medicine.
In a recent article, Slate writer Rachel Aviv argued that Christians and scientists should be more tolerant of each other’s faith than their rivals.
She said, “The best way to help them is to embrace them.”
That’s a great statement, and I think that’s a good goal, but it’s one that’s not really helping us.
First, the Left’s religious bias has long been well documented.
For instance, one of the first attempts to label science as a religion was the “science of evolution,” which was promoted in a 1952 book by an evangelical Christian named Robert J. Loe Fisher.
Fisher was a prominent figure in the Christian Right, which is the branch of the Christian right that has been so influential on the Republican Party for decades.
Fisher is best known for the book The Scientific Paranormal, which was a classic of the pseudoscience movement, and which argued that science was not a valid basis for religion.
Fisher’s book was a watershed moment in the evolution of the creationist movement, which at the time was primarily a movement against evolution.
It helped create the belief that science couldn’t be trusted and was somehow harmful to faith.
Fisher wrote, “If there are any doubts about the validity of evolution, there is no doubt about the correctness of the theory of evolution.
Science is not a religion.”
That same year, Fisher published his third book, Evolution and Religion.
It is an excellent book.
Fisher has long held a position of influence in the conservative Christian right, and he was one of its founders, although he never officially became a leader of the movement.
Fisher argued that evolution was a “science that teaches that the earth was created in six days and that the heavens and the earth are the same size and the same length,” which is a very similar position to the positions of the scientific establishment.
Fisher also argued that there was a scientific consensus on the matter, and that it was established by “the most careful and scientific analysis.”
Fisher was the father of the evolution movement, but he never became a member of the religious right.
He wrote that he was “a scientist who believes that science should not be used to promote religion,” and he argued that “science should be used for the good of humanity and the good as a whole.”
This position is very similar to the position taken by William Lane Craig, who was a founding member of that movement.
Craig argued that scientific findings were “not the ultimate authority for the belief of a particular faith,” but rather that they should be applied to “the good of society and the welfare of mankind.”
This is a position that was taken by a number of prominent Christian conservatives over the last decades.
It has also been embraced by many evangelical Christians, including Billy Graham, who famously stated, “Science is not the Bible.”
And I think there’s good reason to believe that the same position has been taken by the mainstream of the evangelical movement.
It’s also a position supported by the National Association of Evangelicals, which has been a leader in this movement.
They’ve also been one of Fisher’s main supporters.
And I believe that, with this group of influential evangelical Christians who have supported Fisher, Fisher has succeeded in convincing a number.
It also provides a strong argument that it’s important for the Left to be seen as more moderate than they have ever been.
But I would say that the anti-scientific movement has been on the rise in the United States for quite some time.
There are a number reasons for that, but one of them is that anti-vaccine sentiment has increased, and more Americans are becoming concerned about the safety of vaccines, and vaccines are becoming more expensive.
It was a particularly significant development in 2016, as anti-vaxxers took over the anti-“vaccine movement” movement.
And now we see that the pro-vaccination movement is also becoming more mainstream.
As more Americans become concerned about vaccine safety, anti-medical beliefs are on the march, and the anti–science movement is being replaced by an anti-anti-science movement.
As an example of the trend, in February, the New York Times reported that there were more anti-government conspiracy theories than anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.
That’s not a very surprising trend, and anti-social views are also increasing, although it’s not clear whether the rise of anti-immigration conspiracy theories is a direct consequence of anti–